Do not put your full street address on a resume. List city and state or city and country: Austin, TX. That satisfies recruiters checking location and time zone, feeds ATS location filters, and avoids handing your home address to every database your resume lands in. Add relocation or work-authorization notes only when they preempt a real doubt.
The full address was a mailing artifact — offers and rejections once arrived by post. Nothing in a modern hiring pipeline mails you anything until after an offer, at which point HR collects your address through a form. On the resume itself, the street and number add zero screening information while adding real costs: your home address sits in ATS databases, recruiter exports, and forwarded PDFs indefinitely, with security and privacy implications you cannot retract.
There is also a subtle bias surface. A street address encodes neighborhood, and commute-distance judgments happen informally — a recruiter deciding you are probably too far away is a decision you never get to argue with. City-level location gives them what the process legitimately needs and nothing it does not.
One fragment in your contact line: Austin, TX, or Dubai, UAE for international applications, alongside phone, email, and LinkedIn. This is not decoration — ATS location filters and recruiter searches genuinely run on it, and a resume with no location at all can drop out of geo-filtered searches or read as evasive. City plus region is the minimum that keeps you findable.
For remote roles, location still matters for time zone and employment law, so list it, optionally with a clarifier: Lisbon, Portugal, remote, UTC+0. If you are targeting a market you have not moved to yet, say so explicitly — relocating to London, March 2027 — because otherwise the mismatch between your location and the job's reads as an application mistake rather than a plan.
Add a clarifying phrase only when the reader would otherwise assume wrongly. Open to relocation matters when applying out-of-market; authorized to work in the US without sponsorship matters when your history suggests otherwise; omit both when they answer questions nobody would ask. Every extra clause in the contact line dilutes the four things that must be instantly findable: name, phone, email, location.
Never fake a local address to game geo-filters. The lie surfaces at scheduling — interviews, notice periods, and onboarding paperwork all reference where you actually are — and it converts a solvable logistics question into a credibility problem. If distance is the objection, the honest relocation line plus a strong resume is the only play that survives contact with the process.
Leaving off the street address, no. Leaving off location entirely can — geo-filtered recruiter searches may skip you and readers wonder about time zone. City and state or city and country is the reliable middle ground.
State it directly: current city plus relocating to target city and a date if you have one. Ambiguity gets you filtered as too far; a fake local address collapses at scheduling. A plan stated plainly is the credible option.
Yes. Remote employers still screen on time zone, tax jurisdiction, and legal ability to hire in your country. City and country, optionally with UTC offset, answers those questions without giving away a street address.
The free scorer checks your contact block for what recruiters and parsers need — and flags what should not be there.
